This past summer I saw the NOLA
Project’s production of Adventures in Wonderland. It really stood out in my memory because it
was absolutely hilarious. The shows was
essentially three shows in one and you would pick which of the three track you
want go on and they would eventually all intermingle at points in the
show. I took the tea party track, which
was stationary where as the other two were ones that were led by a
character. It was an original show
sprung from a classic and I loved it, although I didn’t necessarily find the
production to be “informative.” Where as
I saw Cabaret at Tulane Summer Lyric this past summer as well, and even though I
didn’t find it to be holistically convincing, it is very unrealistic, it’s a
musical. I did recognize truth,
particularly with the actor who played the Emcee. I found his performance to be truthful not
only because he was the only person in the show that is actually written to be the
revealer of the true depravity of the situation during Nazi Germany, but also
because the character this actor created was crying and his emcee makeup was
running. It was a manic-ish crying and
it was fascinating to watch and captivating.
So it made me think that although I never experienced Nazi Germany,
within the parameters of this show I was convinced that those tears were truth,
That hot tears causing elaborate make up to run was how Nazi Germany was
like. I had a real and terrifying
glimpse and it was great.
I think there is definitely a
difference between performances that offer some kind of (new or newly clarified)
truth versus performances that strive for documentary “verbatim” or
naturalistic reality. Performances that
offer some kind of new truths I feel are groundbreaking and organic, I think
that they can only truly happen and be performed once though. I think that the documentary style is just a
reel of an event and no truth is shown at all.
I feel that a construct new perspective is shown, but I don’t think that
that means its truth. It is a newly
constructed half- truth, because although the facts and words maybe true, that
doesn’t mean that all context is present and context is sometimes
everything.
Do you consider a new perspective to be different than a truth? Martin describes that it really depends on the audience's background, politics, etc...A new perspective to you may be someone else's truth? My thesis performance is centered around an Iranian-American pastor currently in prison in Iran. I wonder what kind of show or story it would be if I had access to or commentary on Iran's view of the story...rather than the news reports and letters I have access to in America. Would we gain a new truth about Iranian lifestyles, customs, or politics that would perhaps open our eyes? Maybe...maybe not. But it's an interesting concept to think about.
ReplyDelete